KINGSVIEW
INFANT BAPTISM FRIDAY AFTER
ADULT BAPTISM SUNDAY
Michael
A. King
Before a smile seemed to spread
across my life from somewhere, maybe even
an impish Spirit, that Sunday I wrapped
up the series of seven sermons on key
Anabaptist-Mennonite teachings our
associate pastor and I had been
preaching. Amid an influx of new members
largely from backgrounds other than
Mennonite, those of us in congregational
leadership had settled on this approach
as a way to emphasize basic teachings and
test whether we were within reach of
consensus on core values.
Throughout the series I
made much of adult baptism. I recounted
how in early 1500s Europe arose the
conviction that the decision to follow
Christ was one to be made by persons old
enough to understand and count the cost.
I distinguished between Christendom and
believers church understandings of
Christianity. In Christendom, as some
would name the collection of
Christianized nations of 1500s Europe,
the very act of being born into and then
baptized as a baby into a nearly seamless
interweaving of church and nation makes
you a Christian.
In a believers church,
you become Christian by consciously
choosing to follow Christ. You then mark
your decision publicly by baptism amid
the believers you now knowingly and
intentionally join.
In Christendom, I
noted, there is considerable risk that
nation and society will take priority
over Jesus teachings. This is
because Christendom can make it seem as
if whatever your nation or culture wants
is also what Jesus wants.
In a believers church
tradition such as espoused by
Anabaptists, including the Mennonite wing
who took their name from Menno Simons,
Dutch priest turned Anabaptist, the first
loyalty is to Gods nation. Its
citizens are believers committed to
living above all by Gods laws
particularly as taught by Jesus rather
than according to human laws. If the
demands of citizenship in Gods
nation clash with the demands of
ones earthly nation, in a believers
church understanding one chooses God over
local loyalties.
And the core sign of
this view is adult or believers baptism.
The early Anabaptists felt compelled to
mark their break from Christendom nations
in favor of Gods nation by
rebaptizing each other. Then it would be
unmistakably clear, to them and to those
surrounding them: Christ over nation.
Understandably
Christendom recoiled. These Anabaptists
declaring their higher loyalties risked
destroying Christendom. So the
Anabaptists, meaning
"rebaptizers," were told to
recant or else. Thousands remained
unbowed. They had declared their loyalty
to God through Christ. They had meant it,
they had counted the cost, they would pay
any price. Unrepentant, they accepted
torture, drownings, burnings at stakes.
They have something to
teach us, I suggested, even today, maybe
especially today, as Christendom seems at
times to be reviving. Even contemporary
democracies whose constitutional
commitment is to distinguish between
church and state seem increasingly
tempted to find salvation in the hope
that if church again becomes state and
state becomes church, then God will
bless. But history suggests that when
state and church become each other,
church loses. God loses. Faithfulness to
Christs more radical teachings
fades or is even actively stamped out.
So let us be believers
church and not Christendom members, I
preached. And let us treasure believers
baptism as the mark of our decision.
That was Sunday. For a few days I
enjoyed a feeling of completion. I felt
renewed commitment to
Anabaptist-Mennonite understandings. Then
came Friday and Elrena Evans.
She was querying my
interest in publishing "Me and My
House" (now in this Winter 2008
issue of DreamSeeker Magazine). I
started in with the inevitably skeptical
attitude of an editor forced to reject
some 90 percent of submissions because
they dont fit the magazine. Then I
realized here was trouble. Here was
writing so skillful and moving that as
never before in my life I could get, as
if from the inside, why one might see the
baptism of an infant as an event to
treasure rather than reject, a
celebration to honor rather than to die
opposing.
Still I wanted to
reject. How to square this with the
passions I had just invested in that
preaching series?
Finally I said to Evans
that although the hoped-for audience is
broader than Mennonite, "DreamSeeker
Magazine emerges from an
Anabaptist-Mennonite publisher. . . . And
as you also may be aware, Anabaptists got
burned at the stake and drowned in 1500s
Europe for rebaptizing themselves (the
name Anabaptism means rebaptizer
and was given them by their enemies) for
their belief that Jesus taught baptism
for adults. Thus was born the adult
baptism/believers church tradition.
"It just so
happens," I continued, "that
Im pastor of an
Anabaptist-Mennonite congregation among
whom are many newer participants who have
mixed feelings about Anabaptist-Mennonite
teachingsincluding adult
baptism." I reported that having
just completed a sermon series on these
teachings was causing me to ponder
"how we retain a core Mennonite
identity yet honor perspectives of those
shaped in different traditions.
"Now here," I
observed, "comes your article on
baptism of your baby daughter!
Interesting the ways of the Spirit."
I noted how movingly the narrative fit
the DreamSeeker Magazine quest for
"voices from the soul," which
made it hard indeed to turn down. I
suggested accepting the story for
publication then possibly "writing
something myself on the intrigue of
publishing this celebration of infant
baptism in a magazine emerging from an
adult-baptism tradition."
We agreed. This was a way to
proceed. So now we have. Evans speaks in
these pages. As do I. We speak so
differently. We reflect ways of thinking
each so convinced of being the Truth that
our forebears thought deathwhether
imposing or accepting itwas better
than compromise.
Why resist still
fighting each other, if not to physical
death in our occasionally more civilized
times, at least until one or the other
emerges the spiritual victor? Evans, who
had in fact understood that DreamSeeker
Magazine emerges from an Anabaptis
tradition valuing believers baptism, had
realized battle was a possibility when
she submitted the article. She
wouldnt have been surprised to
receive a summary rejection.
But I found I had in
this case no stomach for battle, not even
for just the first shot of rejection. It
was one thing to champion believers
baptism in my own congregation. It was
another thing to deny Evans her story and
its treasures any more than Id
accept her denying my story and its
treasures.
But what alternative to
fighting is there? Surely one of us is
wrong? Then I remember that Evans says
this: "My life resembles this
liturgy of baptism, in that it often
seems like a series of questions."
This sounds familiar, I think. This
sounds like . . . me.
Yes, I embrace the
value and meaning of believers baptism.
But I too have found that life is a
series of questions. Even in my own
congregation, after the sermon series
ended, Ive wrestled with how to
journey with those from infant baptism
traditions who are saying that yes, they
get why Anabaptist-Mennonites underscore
adult baptism. But no, theyre not
so sure this means their own infant
baptism, followed by confirmation rites
in which they claimed the meaning of what
they once were too young to understand,
must be superseded by rebaptism. Would I
feel any differently if I were they?
Probably not. Now what?
I dont want to
make this an answer column. Im not
sure enough of what we do next when faced
with your treasure being my lump of coal
or vice-versa. But as tensions within and
between faith traditions seem ever to be
mounting these days, finding alternatives
to battle seems ever more important. So I
want to benefit from wrestling with this
riddle the Spirit seems to have handed
me: How do I treasure my own
understandings of baptism and
simultaneously see treasure in that
soulful story of coming to believe that
through baptism a daughter "is
sealed as Gods own"?
Michael A.
King, Telford, Pennsylvania, is pastor,
Spring Mount (Pa.) Mennonite Church; and
editor, DreamSeeker Magazine.
|