EDITORIAL: In the
Beginning
Words, words, and
more words. Creeks and rivers of words
spilling from countless books and
magazines and the endless Internet,
flooding into that rising ocean of words
that threaten to drown us all. Now even
more words from DreamSeeker Magazine.
Why add to the deluge?
Because always we lovers of
words sense somewhere still echoing in us
those verses of Genesis which tell us
that, confronted with the void, God spoke
the words that set creation in motion.
Then God told us to continue creation by
naming what God had spoken into being.
So we do. No matter how many
words spew forth, uselessly enough more
often than not, still we ache to find
some part of the void until now untouched
by human words and from it help call into
being yet more new worlds.
This is not to imply the words
in DSM are better than those
elsewhere. Rather, the hope is simply
that even amid the risk of too many
words, always there is fresh dreaming to
be done.
As DSM editor,
Ill be guided by the conviction
that amid the many Anabaptist magazines
already publishing fine visions, there is
room for another dedicated to publishing
voices from the soul, meaning
writers aching to share passionate and
personal dreams of how the void has been
or could be shaped into a new creation.
Commenting in The New York
Times Book Review (Jan. 7, 2001, p.
35) on The Big Chill in
writing, Roxana Robinson contends that
whereas a century ago books throbbed with
emotion, now passion is largely
absent from our books: an icy chill has
crept across the writers
landscape. She hopes that in
the new century well rediscover
passion; I agreeand hope
DSM can be part of the quest.
DSM writing level will
range from homespun simplicity through
whatever depths a writer wants to explore
without limiting audience to specialists.
As can be seen in this first issue, style
will include straightforward exposition
yet with a tendency toward lyricism.
Ill aim as editor to give DSM
readers a reliable source of
well-edited writing rooted in core
Anabaptist or faith-related passions.
Ill also offer writers considerable
latitude to decide for themselves what
topics they must dream their way through
and in what style to be true to their
unique callings.
And Ill work to keep DSM
from drifting only toward the leftwing
radicalism some see as the inevitable
result of seeking new dreams. Surely
there is as much fresh speaking to be
done by those whose bent is conservative
and who dream their way across the
unexplored terrains of the traditional.
Roxana Robinson urges us to
consider the possibility that even
inmaybe especially ina new
millennium, love still drives us;
we still need it as the moving force in
what we read. Let the dreamseeking,
heartfelt and passionate and filled with
love, begin.
Michael A. King
|