Reel Reflections
The Shadow of a
Doubt
A Film
Review
David Greiser
A while
ago I made my usual
year-end
list of movies to see over the Christmas holiday. The end of the year
always promises a rash of good movies, as directors and distributors
jockey for attention from critics, with the Academy Award nominations
just around the corner. Near the top of my list of must-sees this year
was a little gem simply called “Doubt.”
“Doubt”
originated as a
play from the pen of the highly respected playwright John Patrick
Shanley, who also created the script for “Moonstruck.” The play version
of “Doubt” garnered a Pulitzer Prize in 2004. It is not likely to get
the same level of attention from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts,
which historically has passed over most plays that are transformed into
films (A notable exception would be the 1985 Best Picture winner,
“Amadeus”).
As a
rule, plays that
become
films can be tedious and talky on the big screen. Though “Doubt” is
certainly longer on talk than on action, the awards committee may want
to take a second look at it anyway. With its timely subject, stellar
cast, and tightly crafted writing, “Doubt” keeps you thinking, feeling,
deciding and, yes, doubting, from beginning to end.
The
story unfolds in
1964, at
St. Nicholas’ Church and Parish School in the Bronx. The school is
housed in one of those aging, airless buildings in which you smell the
mixture of chalk dust, wood finish, and the hint of too many
chili-con-carne lunches as soon as you walk through the door. There is
controversy, too, in the air—controversy brought on by the early
upheavals of Vatican II.
St.
Nicholas’ School is
ruled by the severe, humorless Sister Aloysius (played by a
black-habited Meryl Streep). Sister Aloysius shuns all forms of change,
right down to the innovation of ballpoint pens in her school
(“Penmanship is dying all over the country!”) She has taken up a power
struggle with the popular and progressive, Vatican II-spouting new
priest of the parish, Father Flynn (Philip Seymour Hoffman). Though
initially deferential to the new Father, Sister Aloysius is clearly not
accustomed to having her traditional authority over the school
questioned.
Her
latest protégé is
Sister
James, a naive first year teacher (played by a wide-eyed Amy Adams) who
becomes an unwitting lamb caught between experienced wolves. Sister
James believes in the goodness of her students, a concept Sister
Aloysius is eager to expunge.
In one
scene, Sister
Aloysius
instructs Sister James to hang a portrait of the Holy Father on the
blackboard. When Sister James objects that it is not a picture of the current pope,
Sister Aloysius sputters, “What difference does it make?! When you look
at the glass, you can see a reflection of what the students are doing
at their seats!” For Sister Aloysius, even the youngest are presumed
guilty until proven innocent.
Sister
James confides to
Sister Aloysius that she suspects Father Flynn of having a sexually
abusive relationship with Donald Miller—an eighth grader who happens to
be the school’s first African-American student. Sister James smells
alcohol on Donald’s breath following a private meeting with Father
Flynn in the rectory.
Some of
the best scenes
in
the movie follow this accusation. In one, Sister Aloysius lures Father
Flynn to her office under the pretext of discussing the school
Christmas pageant. When Father Flynn surmises that the conversation is
really about his relationship with one of the students, he rises slowly
from the principal’s desk where he has been sitting, and Sister
Aloysius takes his place.
From
then on, Sister
Aloysius
controls the conversation. The interrogation is emotionally taut,
employing close-ups and the extensive dramatic range of two of the best
film actors working today.
A
second powerful scene
involves a conversation between Sister Aloysius and Donald Miller’s
mother (played by Viola Davis). Mrs. Miller fears that her son will be
expelled from school, and she appeals to Sister Aloysius to drop her
investigation. Although she is only on screen for one scene, Viola
Miller’s performance as the mother in an impossible situation may be
the most stunning in the whole film. See it for yourself and decide.
Is
Father Flynn guilty of
sexual abuse? “Doubt” leaves us doubting. Or maybe not. I saw this film
with two other persons, and the conversation afterward was fascinating
and vigorous. One person was sure the priest was guilty. Another was
certain he was not. The third was uncertain. Since then, I’ve spoken to
others who saw the film and were equally certain that they knew “the
truth” about what actually happened.
Such is
the mark of good
writing about a sensitive contemporary subject. “Doubt” takes us into a
world forty years removed from our own, yet it does so in a way that
reveals how little both the world and the church have truly changed in
the interim. The clothing may have been modernized and the Mass given a
facelift. But the larger questions of power and accountability need
answering, not only in the Catholic Church but the whole Christian
church. About that nature of challenge, “Doubt” leaves us little doubt
at all.
—Dave
Greiser
directs the
Pastoral Ministries Program and teaches in the Bible and Ministry
Department at Hesston College, in Hesston, Kansas.
|