EDITORIAL:
Amazing Grace and 09-11-01
This issue of DSM
was moving toward proofreading as
09-11-01 created before and after. Thank
God before and after are similar enough
it is possible for writings from before
to still speak after. Surely the
underlying faith in grace which threads
its way implicitly through these pages is
now even more needed. If there is
anything with power to cut the cycle of
violence, it is amazing grace,
that love which stuns by appearing
precisely when least expected or
deserved.
But if
those pre-attack ponderings of grace
still resonate in the quieter sides of
our lives, we are also needing to ponder
how grace applies post-attack. My first
ruminations involved what to say as
pastor at a prayer service the day after.
I was grateful to be held accountable by
awareness of diverse participants. Many
had been shaped by a lifetime of historic
peace church influences. Others had
joined the congregation with appreciation
for its peace position but from families
whose members had a history of honorable
military service.
As I
stood before this rich mix, it seemed it
would make a mockery of the love of
enemies I was about to preach to value
only some perspectives. My instinct was
(and still is) to call for waging peace,
not the promised retaliation. But I
risked launching pacifism so righteously
as to become one more zealot. Thus though
I worried that the risk for those with
military ties might be knee-jerk support
for retaliation, I sensed I needed what
they could see even as I hoped they might
benefit from what I could see.
Sothough
aware of complexities of applying themI
suggested we might learn from each of
these texts:
In Romans 13:1-4 the apostle Paul says
God ordains government, and if you
do wrong, you should be afraid, for the
authority does not bear the sword in
vain! Might a biblical response to
terror include U.S. police
action to bring to justice those most
responsible?
In 12:19 Paul forbids revenge.
Vengeance is mine, I will
repay, says the Lord, he
quotes. Surely Christians dare support no
action motivated purely by vengeance and
claiming the right therefore to do unto
others what has been done to us.
In Matthew 5:43, Jesus teaches, You
have heard that it was said, An eye
for an eye, but I say. . . .
What a huge but that is now,
after 09-11. Yet how deeply it resonates
as a different way of proceeding.
Exactly
what actions these texts might lead our
congregation to support, I dont
know. But I hope linking them invites us
to offer each other the amazing grace of
inviting all views to contribute to
discernmentrather than
turning even each other into enemies
battling over what sword God lets
authority wield and how enemies are
loved.
Michael A. King
|